RomneyCare’s FREE Abortions

RomneyCare Now Funding FREE Abortions

A Disqualifier for Mitt Romney’s Candidacy

By Amy Contrada

EXCERPT:

March 7, 2012

RomneyCare now offers free elective surgical abortions.

Mitt Romney was the enabler. This is how his government-dictated health plan is playing out. And he’s still proud of it. When he does touch on defects in his health plan, he never mentions abortion coverage as a problem. He’s either fine with it, or realizes he has to downplay it to get the conservative vote.

When the law was first implemented, there was a $50 copay for a RomneyCare elective surgical abortion.  Now RomneyCare abortions are “free” for a $0 copay (or $50-$100 in some plans).  In fact, the $0 copay shows up as early as 2008 at the Massachusetts Health Care Connector site.  (The “Commonwealth Care” plans cover low-income residents, many of whom pay no monthly premiums.)

Of course, the abortions are not exactly free. We, the taxpayers cover the cost, whether we want to or not.

Deadly health risks for women: The unspoken side of the Obama birth control mandate

Deadly health risks for women: The unspoken side of the Obama birth control mandate

By Jenn Giroux, former director HLI America

EXCERPT:

For far too long there has been an ominous silence across America on arguably the most controversial and devastating issue of the day — birth control. As so often we see in history, oppression gives rise to courage and, no question, courage is exactly what we are seeing in Church leaders and layman alike in response to the Obama administration’s recent birth control mandate and more recent unacceptable modifications.

The Birth Control Mandate has forced the issue of contraception to move from being the elephant in the room to center stage. Perhaps in time we will see that it was a hidden blessing for our country. For years pro-life organizations refused to discuss or take on this topic despite the fact that free access to birth control increases the number of surgical abortions[1][2]. Most people repeat over and over that birth control decreases the number of abortions. Nothing could be farther from the truth. In fact, today for every child born in the US, there are an estimated 2 children killed in the womb from both surgical and chemical, abortifacient drug abortions [3]. What isn’t being talked about is that the new mandate also pre-disposes women to serious long term and permanent health problems. In conjunction with the defense of both religious liberty and the spiritual well-being of women, we must also refute the absurd and deceptive statement that “women are healthier on birth control.”

Read full story.

Stop Planned Parenthood’s assault on women’s health and conscience rights

Stop Planned Parenthood’s assault on women’s health and conscience rights | ALL.org.  August 15, 2011

excerpt

Thus, millions of Catholics would be required to provide and/or participate in insurance plans with free birth control coverage. It also appears it would force Catholic health care institutions to either provide the coverage, or cease employing and serving non-Catholics.

You can read the guidelines and the religious exemption in full here.

The HHS ruling requires provision of free Group 1 carcinogens for women in the form of oral contraceptives. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, an arm of the World Health Organization, lists estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives among 106 other deadly substances like arsenic, asbestos, and tobacco on its most dangerous list of substances-those classified as “carcinogenic to humans.”  [See Estrogen-Progesterone combination.]

HHS must accept public comments on its ruling over the next 60 days. It is critical that people of good will contact HHS and register their disgust with this mandate that we must pay for other people’s birth control-against morality, against our will, and against our religious convictions.

Please go to our action center today and let HHS and other government agencies involved know that this rule is unacceptable and must be repealed.

 

Boehner to Obama, Scrap this bill! – Video

Health Care Summit, February 25, 2010

Rep. John Boehner to President Barack Obama:  “Scrap the bill.”

Obama Told at Health Care Summit Americans Don’t Want Abortion

Washington, DC — It took almost the entire length of the debate
at the White House health care summit for the issue of abortion
to come up and, when it did, pro-life Rep. John Boehner told
President Barack Obama that Americans don’t want abortion funding
in the health care bill Congress is considering.

In the video, note who sits next to the president:   Sec. of HHS Kathleen Sebelius – friend of murdered late-term abortionist Dr. Tiller.

Obama A Big Believer in CCHD

President Obama, Joseph Cardinal Bernardin and Universal Health Care

November 19, 2009

Washington Times

Conning the conservatives by Matthew Vadum

Excerpts:

Growing up, I always thought Jesus’ admonition in the Book of Matthew, “The poor you will always have with you,” wasn’t meant to be taken literally as a directive to ignore the poor, but that’s exactly what a prominent Roman Catholic charity believes.

As this Sunday’s “second collection” approaches, most Catholics planning to donate to the Catholic Campaign for Human Development probably think their money will be used to help the poor by funding soup kitchens and homeless shelters. Well, the joke’s on them. CCHD has never provided direct relief to the poor. That’s not its purpose.

It is an extreme left-wing political organization created to feed and foster radical groups like ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now).  Most Catholics are blissfully unaware of its true mission, though it says right on its Web site that it aims to support “organized groups of white and minority poor to develop economic strength and political power.”

Long mocked as the “Catholic Campaign to Help Democrats,” CCHD is the charitable arm of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Since its creation in 1969 – the year before ACORN was founded – CCHD says it has given more than $290 million to fund what it calls more than 8,000 “low-income-led, community-based projects that strengthen families, create jobs, build affordable housing, fight crime, and improve schools and neighborhoods.” Some say the grand total is closer to $450 million.

Both ACORN and CCHD were inspired by radical agitator Saul Alinsky, the Marxist Machiavelli who dedicated his activism opus, “Rules for Radicals,” to Lucifer, whom he called “the first radical.”  The late Mr. Alinsky developed the concept of “community organizing” in order to mobilize poor neighborhoods to make demands, long and loud, on public officials and the private sector.

CCHD gives generously to the Industrial Areas Foundation, which Mr. Alinsky himself founded, and to similar leftist groups including the Gamaliel Foundation, People Improving Communities Through Organizing (PICO), and Direct Action and Research Training Institute (DART).

Over the years, some Catholics have called out CCHD for its Marxist radicalism.

Former Treasury Secretary William E. Simon, a Catholic layman, complained in the late 1980s that CCHD was a “funding mechanism for radical left-wing political activism in the United States, rather than for traditional types of charities.”

Catholic writer Paul Likoudis observed that CCHD could be considered “a political mechanism bonding the American Church to the welfare state.”

But President Obama is a big believer in CCHD. In 1985-88 he ran the Developing Communities Project from an office in Chicago’s Holy Rosary Church. The project was part of the Gamaliel network.

I got my start as a community organizer working with mostly Catholic parishes on the South Side of Chicago that were struggling because the steel plants had closed,” Mr. Obama told Catholic Digest. CCHD “helped fund the project, and so very early on, my career was intertwined with the belief in social justice that is so strong in the church.”

Mr. Obama has said he “tried to apply the precepts of compassion and care for the vulnerable that are so central to Catholic teachings to my work [such as in] making health care a right for all Americans.”

CLICK HERE TO READ FULL ARTICLE

RELATED:

From Catholic Digest’s Interview of Presidential Candidate Barack Obama:

[Catholic Digest]:  What are the top reasons American Catholics should vote for you in 2008?

Obama: I got my start as a community organizer working with mostly Catholic parishes on the South Side of Chicago that were struggling because the steel plants had closed. The Campaign for Human Development helped fund the project, and so very early on, my career was intertwined with the belief in social justice that is so strong in the Church. I’ve tried to apply the precepts of compassion and care for the vulnerable that are so central to Catholic teachings to my work, [such as in] making health care a right for all Americans — I was the sponsor in the state legislature for the Bernardin Amendment, named after Cardinal Bernardin, a wonderful figure in Chicago I had the opportunity to work with who said that health care should be a right. And in the United States Senate, (I was) working on issues such as immigration reform that would combine the principle that we’re a nation of laws with the notion that we are also all God’s children and that we have to open our hearts to those who are less fortunate than we are.

Click Here to read Chicago’s Joseph Cardinal Bernardin:   Universal Access To Health Care is a Right - from his ‘Consistent Ethic of Life and Health Care Reform (pdf)’ speech, 1994.  SEE Pages 9-11.

Excerpts:

  • In 1981, the bishops spoke of health care as a “basic human right . . . “
  • ” . . . the bishops were not saying that a person had a right to health, but that, . . . one must have a right to access . . .
  • Under the title distributive justice, society has the obligation to meet the reasonable claims of its citizens so that they can realize and exercise their fundamental human rights.
  • I believe that the only way this obligation can be effectively met by society is for our nation to make universal health care coverage a reality.  Universal access is not enough.  [Emphases in original]

Archbishops defend CCHD as criticism continue

 

Sarah Palin Reaffirms Her View of Death Panels

National Review Online

Excerpt:

The fact is that any group of government bureaucrats that makes decisions affecting life or death is essentially a “death panel.”  The work of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, President Obama’s health policy advisor and the brother of his chief of staff, is particularly disturbing on this score.  Dr. Emanuel has written extensively on the topic of rationed health care, describing a “Complete Lives System” for allotting medical care based on “a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.”

FULL ARTICLE

Who Shall Live? Rationed Health Care

In a New York Times 1997 article it was revealed that Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, has a brother in health policy research,, oncologist Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel.  More recently, an Op-Ed in the New York Post last month titled, ‘Deadly Doctors:  Advisors Want To Ration Care’ confirms Emanuel’s connection to Obama’s health care reform:  he’s part of the Administration.

A colleague of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, Victor R. Fuchs, is also a health policy researcher and favors health care reform.  In 1972, Fuchs wrote a scary book, Who Shall Live? Health, Economics, and Social Choice.’ It can be read online at Google Books and is at Amazon.

It’s sick that these health policy researchers with radical ideas sitting in their ivory towers of Academia are behind this nightmare.

Excerpt from New York Post:

The health bills coming out of Congress would put the de- cisions about your care in the hands of presidential appointees. They’d decide what plans cover, how much leeway your doctor will have and what seniors get under Medicare.

Yet at least two of President Obama’s top health advisers should never be trusted with that power.

Start with Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. He has already been appointed to two key positions: health-policy adviser at the Office of Management and Budget and a member of Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Emanuel bluntly admits that the cuts will not be pain-free. “Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely ‘lipstick’ cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change,” he wrote last year (Health Affairs Feb. 27, 2008).

Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, “as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others” (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).

Yes, that’s what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.

Many doctors are horrified by this notion; they’ll tell you that a doctor’s job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time.

Emanuel, however, believes that “communitarianism” should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those “who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia” (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. ’96).

Translation: Don’t give much care to a grandmother with Parkinson’s or a child with cerebral palsy.

He explicitly defends discrimination against older patients: “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years” (Lancet, Jan. 31).

Related:

PBS NOW Program, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel on Universal Health Care.  April 2007.